Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Techy Cutie Pony Collection!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

We all came to this village because we were searching for something missing from our lives. Now, it seems it was in front of us all along. Its us.

dead source46433 safe2176463 artist:tlatophat179 party favor1717 sugar belle3765 pony1604674 unicorn538875 g42031078 the cutie map4367 blue background10439 eyes closed139186 female1804995 floppy ears73076 male551495 mare742462 nuzzling5057 ship:partybelle51 shipping254454 simple background597415 stallion195984 straight179397

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #64E9
  1. magical talking horses with a male/female population ratio drastically different than the two closest comparable real-world species (humans and horse). Please explain which of the alternatives (majority single ponies, majority polyamorous ponies) is more reasonable than majority bisexual ponies, and give a proof. One more solid than “comparison to species which is drastically different in demographic ratio”.
     
    and the more basic point  
  2. the hell does “default” have to do with anything? Let’s assume ponies have the same homosexual/bisexual/heterosexual ratios as reported in humans (even ignoring the very heavy cultural bias involved in currently available statistics) - then it’s still… pretty unremarkable for a given random pony to be non-heterosexual, making “heterosexual is more common that ship is nonsense” complaint still pretty silly.
Background Pony #64E9
@G.S.  
“well, biology” would also be compatible with people being bisexual, and the point there is a drastic population difference between male and female ponies is oft-pointed out. That would imply that either a majority of ponies are single, a majority of ponies are lesbian or bisexual, or polyamory is a major thing amongst them. It’s anyone’s guess which is most reasonable.
 
The difference is that someone is (I assume jokingly or trollingly) unquestioningly attributing a sexuality to a character whose sexuality is not in the least hinted at.  
The shipping fandom, as a whole, only assumes that ponies are whatever sexuality happens to be convenient for their preferred ship - it has nothing to do with “all ponies are straight by default!” or “all ponies are gay by default!”.
 
Get brains, y’silly goosers.