Uploaded by GreenLinzerd 
942x1900 PNG 270 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Hoohoo, now we’re getting into the serious stuff. This time around, we talk fetishes. All the ones I could think of (except for Furry and Bestiality) got squished into these charts for some good old-fashioned analysis. If you say I forgot tentacles then friendshhip is no longer magic.
- Comparing the Safe:Suggestive:Questionable:Explicit ratio in normal ponies, anthros and humans >>730750 (deleted)
- Comparing the Safe:Suggestive:Questionable:Explicit ratio for different characters >>731154
- Comparing the times a character is involved in an image tagged “Lesbian” or “Straight” >>731166
- Comparing the times certain characters are tagged for breasts >>731214
- Futanari (General) >>740752
- Futanari (Comparing proportional frequency of depiction by character)
Without Maud Pie >>740958
With >>742839
- Fetishes on Derpibooru >>748336
- (Part 1) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image ratings >>913513
(Part 2) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image scores >>913544
Source
not provided yet
Even if that was what The Smiling Pony said, I would still agree with it. As long as it is all fictional (drawings, RP, literature, games, etc) and does not involve real underage people, it is not harming anyone. And it allows pedophiles (who cannot really remove the fetish easily) a harmless outlet for their urges.
I’d rather live in a world without thoughtcrimes where people are allowed to like icky things, rather than in one where fiction is criminalized, tyvm.
“We divide the world to stop us feeling frightened
Into wrong and into right and
Into black and into white and
Into real men and fairies
Into status quo and scary
Yeah we want the world binary, binary
But it’s not that simple…”
@The Smiling Pony
“pedophilia is perfectly fine so long as it’s just drawings”
What a world we live in…
If it involves only drawings, then technically nothing. If it involves any kind of photos or video or whatever of real people, then it should be self evident why that’s supremely fucked up.
What’s wrong with pedophilia if it’s not involve RL child molestation?
And I love to see people try to defend foalcon as not pedophilic. The other fetishes are weird, sure, but at least they (generally) involve adults. Foalcon depicts child characters. It’s pedophilia. People need to quit lying to themselves.
Yes, I’m quite opinionated about certain things. Some would say charmingly so.
Fair enough. I guess if it was a single instance of it, someone drank a potion or a spell went wrong (or oh-so right), it would get a transformation tag.
I lied, nobody says my being opinionated is charming.
That’s a whole lot of comment there. But since you only asked one question, no problem.
No, R63 is not covered by transformation. Bear in mind that a lot of R63 will be R63 because it takes place in a parallel universe where everyone is R63, without any kind of transformation required.
That’s a lot more foalcon than I was expecting. I always kind of thought it was mostly a fringe thing. You might run into the occasional drawing of Sweetie Belle’s butt, but otherwise, it was pretty rare. Clearly, this is not the case. I’d post a reaction image of cringing CMCs, but apparently people would just rub one out to it. Keep on shakin’ those brony stereotypes! Side note: 6,000+ foalcon images as of 10-27-2014; 2,124 for older, -safe of 6-9-2015. That’s…discouraging.
For some reason, that big drop-off between bondage and macro/micro seems noteworthy to me.
I’ve seen those sneezing images, but I didn’t think they were a fetish. I figured noses were, from all those “check out Celestia’s nostrils” images, but not when stuff comes out.
Non-excessive eating isn’t on here. Stranger than that, I noticed and felt like I needed to mention it. Maybe I’m the weird one about that.
Is R63 covered by transformation?
The awkward moment when you realize people love girls with dicks more than anything else.
…No, honestly, the brony community isn’t full of pedos…
/sarcasm
Some people have weird fetishes… it’s Rule 36 of the Internet.
I already know, but how can anyone fap to this?
Sex that involves killing one of the partners, usually the female since a dead male doesn’t hold an erection very well.
I was thinknig about it from a practical viewpoint, i.e. there’s a difference between eating somebody and stuffing them up your butt.
I still feel like there should just be a “vore (total)” bar, though. None of the other fetishes are split up like that.
Mhmm, I’m mostly just stating it for the effect of “don’t feel the need to redo the chart just because of missing or misrepresenting one or two little things, it’s not going to ever be perfect because of how these things work.” Heh.