Uploaded by GreenLinzerd 
1032x614 PNG 103 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
As an afterthought, the prevalence of futanari and how it compares to non-futa.
- Comparing the Safe:Suggestive:Questionable:Explicit ratio in normal ponies, anthros and humans >>730750 (deleted)
- Comparing the Safe:Suggestive:Questionable:Explicit ratio for different characters >>731154
- Comparing the times a character is involved in an image tagged “Lesbian” or “Straight” >>731166
- Comparing the times certain characters are tagged for breasts >>731214
- Futanari (General) >>740752
- Futanari (Comparing proportional frequency of depiction by character)
Without Maud Pie >>740958
With >>742839
- Fetishes on Derpibooru >>748336
- (Part 1) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image ratings >>913513
(Part 2) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image scores >>913544
Source
not provided yet
Well, ive never been such a big fan of something until MLP, so you’re kinda right XD
Apparently you’ve never been on the NSFW side of any internet fandom before :P
characters who are futa who are drawn in non-sexual ways.
Seems like if we do it’s a 1%. I don’t know HOW you’d get futa that is SFW
Yeah… Twilight needs more futa pics to compete with Futashy… also I’m probably one of the many, many reasons why headcanons should never be taken seriously.
Unless it involves shipping Flash Sentry off to a part of the world where he’ll never return to the show.
Also, there is a disturbingly low amount of Trixie futa.
Ehhhh….
Times like this where Twilight being a secret Hermaphodite needs to be canon.
The obvious and liberally applied appeal to giving the demure one a powerful male attribute.
If she’s a zoomorphic pony wearing a Scooby Doo collar and interacting with humanized versions of the other characters, you’d have to be clueless about Futashy not to know that’s Futashy, even if you only see her from the collar up.
That raises the question of who decides what is Futashy and what is not. If the artist draws a picture of Fluttershy and says, “It’s really Futashy; I just hid the naughty bits,” should we as the viewer be expected to accept that interpretation?
Rene Magritte once drew a picture of a pipe with the caption, “This is not a pipe.” You could label every (safe) picture of Fluttershy “This is Futashy” and be just as authoritative.
When it’s a character for whom that is their most notable trait, or when the artist says so.
But no, it’s usually not very relevant to those pics.
And in that case how do you even know they’re futa, or how does that matter at all to the picture >_>
The pics where they’re futa, but don’t actually show the evidence of such.