@Background Pony #B27C
By the end of the series, she was done with stallions and married solely to the grind.

@delete
Brutes who eat their young and the pony ladder’s bottom rung, respectively.

@PonyPon  
Well, why not? She’s swooned over stallions who aren’t unicorns, and why would she not like a pony just because they didn’t have a horn? I doubt she would have liked Blueblood and Trenderhoof and Fancy Pants any less if they were earth ponies or pegasi. And she’s enthusiastic about Canterlot because it’s a super posh city.

@PurpleWonderPower  
Sure it is.

Who says she prefers unicorns? She swoons over stallions because they’re handsome and she’s faint-hearted. It’s probably just a coincidence that they’re all unicorns.

@Background Pony #6572  
Ah, I get it now. Must have missed or forgotten that bit.

@DrNazus  
It says she preferred unicorns, so she would enjoy Twilight’s company less.

@Background Pony #6572  
Nothing that says she dislikes the other races, just that she’d prefer to marry her own kind.

So does this mean Rarity disliked Twilight after she became an alicorn?

@Ebalosus  
Oh right. They are still part of the caucasoid group.  
So ethnicity.
 
 
@Darth Sonic  
One culture will take over or marginalize the other. I have no qualms about miscegenation except when it is perversely promoted for one group and no others. I don’t think it is now, but the idea of it being so strikes me as having sinister intent.
 
Unless some grand scale coexistence experiment is done I will err on the side of caution.

@DrNazus  
@Ebalosus  
Only now realise I forgot to reply. Soz.

@Whatevs
 
>Hispanic  
>Race
 

 
How does that make any sense? Am I, a New Zealander of Scots-Irish descent part of a race of New Zealanders that are also of Scots-Irish descent, or are we a Pakehá race, or part of the “white” race?
 
All this talk about race reminds me of a skit from Da Ali G Show (the British one, not that fucking awful american one) where Ali G was offended that “Africa” wasn’t represented at the United Nations, to which the ambassador replied that Africa is represented, but through multiple nations. Ali G couldn’t wrap his head round that, since he believed that there was only an “African” nation, not nations in Africa.
 
Same thing here: people use the word “race”, but fail to delineate the definitions of each “race”, or use sweeping generalisations to catagorise whole peoples whom have nothing to do with each other into broad catagories based upon a few visible factors (skin colour, language, origin, et cetera).

@Whatevs  
I don’t care one way or the other. I find the idea of “Racial Extinction” via intermarriage laughable. Race and ethnicity has no inherent worth as far as I’m concerned, only humanity. The only thing worth preserving is the culture, and to hell with your skin color. As long as humanity is perserved, I care not if we’re all replaced by coffe-colored raceless grandchildren.
 
Also, Asains are hella sexy and your insane if you say otherwise :P

@Background Pony #737A  
So you believe we are alone in the universe, despite the mathematical immposibility of that?
 
K.

@Darth Sonic  
I dislike it as something ‘encouraged’, particularly when only for one race in particular.
 
Like if a large amount of media showed hispanics marrying outside their race and glorified it. I would argue that is weird at the very least.
 
But idc if two people of different races want to get married and have kids.

@Background Pony #737A  
Explain yourself.

@Darth Sonic  
I chose to ignore your “primary point” because (A) It was factually incorrect, and (B) Because it is used to promote a faux diversity agenda.

@Whatevs  
Where do things like Interracial marriages fall within that?
 
Not an accusation. Just trying to gauge your stance.

@Darth Sonic  
A good idea but one that can be twisted into celebrating phony diversity.
 
True diversity is permitting separate peoples to have self determination as distinct groups but still part of a loose confederacy.

@Background Pony #737A  
The primary point I was making apparently flew over your head at relativistic speeds.

@Darth Sonic  
Humanity is a species, not a race.

@Darth Sonic  
*used

@Background Pony #009B  
The only race that matters is the human race. We are most certainly not alone in this universe of ours, so we better get ussed to that line of thought or face extinction, irregardless of our former genetic imperatives.

”’race’ (whatever that means) is genetic  
What? How do you not know what it means? Here, just read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race__{28human_classification}29  
and that an in-group bias for relationship based on ’race’ actually exists, beyond the correlation-causation fallacy  
I don’t know what that means but I’ll give it a shot.
 
Basically, we’re all animals. Smarter than the average bear, but still animals. We’re often called “social creatures”, this is true. Like wolves and apes, we work in groups. I remember once seeing a documentary which included a group of apes killing another group of apes. But why, when they’re all apes? Because those apes weren’t us apes. They were a different group. Our group is the only group we care about. This “We like our own lot” mentality has manifested itself in many ways such as tribes, kingdoms, race, nations and even street gangs.  
Oh damn I forgot what I was meant to be talking about. I was gonna say something about genetics to properly explain why a white guy would be attracted to a white girl more than a black one, but I don’t have the right words. Go google “why do we like our own race” or something.

@DrNazus
 
Ok, I take it back: Mr _Silence needs to prove that both ‘race’ (whatever that means) is genetic, and that an in-group bias for relationship based on ‘race’ actually exists, beyond the correlation-causation fallacy

@Ebalosus  
“No, you made the claim”  
What? No I didn’t. Someone explained it was nature, you said “no you’re wrong!” and I told you to prove it.  
Honestly, even I was able to figure out why that sort of things happens with enough thinking time. Why can’t you?