Spoiled for those who fail to unseen things haha  
||Just some constructive criticism if I may, when you used her mouth and muzzle from one of the later two panels it would have benifited to rotate it, or at least her jawline when doing so as due to her leaning forwards in the animation it sort of looks like her jaw dislocates due to the angle of her jaw bone ||  
PS love your work, no question about that,

Twilight’s latest lesson for Starlight? Suck every dick in Ponyville. It’s an advanced friendship lesson.

Too fast cum(

@Background Pony #20A3  
Sure wasn’t the intention. The head shake was supposed to be “cute” in addition to a fun challenge to animate.

@Background Pony #20A3
 
I don’t see how this is even dubious

Wouldn’t this be sexual assault on top of whatever “dubious consent” is supposed to mean?

<3!!!

amazing to see art like yours animated!!!  
gooosh its sweet and sexy perfect! Great work both of you!

@LegendAnger  
I know^^ and thank you very much XD

@Potzm  
Will do. Love the art; no disrespect intended.

She acts just like her. <3

So cute and hot

I like your animation and it turn out be great! >w< <3
 
But next time please ask me first if you may. It will be very helpful for me to keep tabs on anything related to my works in the future. You can of course PM directly here at derpibooru or at my Inkbunny

MOAR

>that cute little head shaking right before S U C C  
masterful job, man.

@Caerdwyn  
slowclap

@BigBuggyBastage
 
This is the kind of advice that gets people in trouble; you are factually and seriously incorrect.
 
There is no mechanism for copyrights being abandoned or otherwise forced into public domain other than either the artist explicitly stating that it is public domain (and no, silence does not give consent), or death of the artist plus seventy years. Lacking that, or an explicit assignment of rights, this would indeed be copyright infringement.
 
Copyright law in the US (which is based upon the Berne Convention of 1971) is in Title 17 of the US Code. See it at https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf … you will find no mechanism for “no defense, no copyright”. What you WILL find is 17.302(a) (duration: creator’s life + 70 years, or 17.302(c) anonymous creations 95 years to 120 years). You will find 17.106(1)(2)(3)(5) that says the copyright owner has exclusive rights to publish/distribute/prepare derivative works/publicly display the work. You will find 172.201(a) states that the owner of the copyright is the original artist until it is explicitly transferred elsewhere by the original copyright holder… the original artist.
 
So no, you cannot publish a derivative work of a DNP artist. That fails on several levels.
 
And those are the facts. Whatever your opinion may be (or mine), those are the facts.
 
Trademarks do have a mechanism for abandonment, but this isn’t about trademark (which is entirely different from copyright). And in any event, someone sneaking in use of a trademark and getting away with it would never trigger loss of trademark; that requires substantial infringement in trade AND that the trademark holder be aware of it AND that they do nothing about it for many such incidents (assuming they could do something about it at all).
 
In any event, if the original artist says “Do not post”, it’s a douche move to do it anyway, regardless of whatever else (legal or otherwise) may be in play.

needs some minor work, but not bad at all.

@Cabrony  
Just my opinion, but if someone packs up their shit and leaves, and they left anything behind, tough luck for the former owner. Copyright law is pretty much the same way: defend your work, or it’s public domain.

@LegendAnger  
Hmm, well..
 
At the start of the webM there is no outbound audio, which makes sense. However, it also means that there is absolutely no white noise of any kind. Later you have the boop sound clip. That one is fine. At 8 seconds though you start the running clip of the female groaning sounds and there is a very noticeable background white noise which the previous part of the clip lacked. It’s subtle, but still slightly jarring. You might consider running some noise removal over the clip to try and remove the white noise (which could potentially degrade quality a bit, depending). Audacity has a pretty easy to use tool for this. Failing that – and this will probably sound counter-intuitive– you could considering ADDING a running clip of white noise to the rest of the clip so the entire webm has it. It would need to be a sample taken from the moaning clip and not random white noise though, else it’ll sound too different more than likely.
 
That’s about it really. The sound effects themselves are ‘decent’, but without hiring a specific VA to do clips for you it’ll kind of always be that way I find. Maybe if you faded the grunts and moans in and/or out a bit it might help them sound just a bit smoother.
 
Just my 2 cents since you asked!  
I still really enjoyed it.

@xRei  
Any advice to improve next time would.be greatly appreciated.

This is why i dont play around with pictures from DNP artists,now you are in quite the pickle.
 
Its even worse when its an artist that was mega famous that just decides to delete everything and vanish from the internet and you cant ask permission anymore.
 
Looking forward to seeing the mystery animation some day.

Boop <3

The sounds feel a little.. off..  
But I loved the animation overall.
 
Glimmy is da best. Blowjobs are awesome.  
Put ’em together!