@Taupe_Hat  
By that metric nearly every shipping image on the site should be tagged mouthpiece.

@Taupe_Hat  
Refer to this

Explain to me why this doesn’t count for the headcanon or mouthpiece tag? It clearly states in the description that the image is a headcanon.

Decent enough art, a bit heavy on the freckles,but all in all not bad.

Any further commentary that isn’t directly related to this image will be removed without warning.
 
Don’t even think of trying to rules-lawyer your way around this.

@Zahnrad  
PM me the link.

@Alexlayer  
I put a link up to a post on 4chan which used that as the OP

@Feydrid Kearn  
Rule N has been around for ages though…

@Alexlayer  
Rude enough to invent a new rule? Unlikely.

@Feydrid Kearn  
Probably something rude.

@Zahnrad  
The fudge did this guy say?

@GrumpyGriffGermán  
They didn’t shove anything, it’s just a picture in support of it. Not everything you disagree with is a forced message, you didn’t have to look at this image.

1.- A bit of freckles doesn’t harm anybody but HOLY COW BATMAN! Now THIS is NOT okay.  
2.- Also shoving LGBT agenda? Really? Not cool artist, not cool.

@Background Pony #FDF3  
It is cute.

@Feydrid Kearn  
That’s a good quality to have.

@Pagan  
I for one don’t find this sort of thing worth attacking someone over. Artists: Draw what you want, and Viewers: Vote what you think, down or up.
 
Had it been up to me, this battle hadn’t have been fought. It wasn’t worth anything. All that happen was a garbage decision was put in place then very forcefully rejected. If anybody on either side gets “triggered” expect me to take a jab at them. Weaklings to words are no friends of mine.
 
“Sticks and stones may break bone, but words (or pictures in this case) will never hurt.”

@Feydrid Kearn  
That may be the case but that still seems like a petty reason to attack the artist to me, it just doesn’t seem like something worthy of getting upset over, it’s not hurting anything or anyone and it’s not trying to offend anyone even if people were offended.
 
It reminds me of the downvote thing actually people said the downvote feature wasn’t trying to offend anyone even if people got offended by it (which is true) so it should stay and be left alone but then when the same thing applies to an image on the site suddenly that argument gets placed on the backburner. I think this just shows some people are too sensitive and for once it isn’t the people in support of this sort of thing.