Uploaded by Pusspuss 
1200x720 PNG 648 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Can’t post this on FA so I will post it here. Small Thing I did for my patrons on patreon. https://www.patreon.com/Pusspuss
Tags
+-SH explicit471678 +-SH alternate version86558 +-SH artist:pusspuss673 +-SH sweetie belle56740 +-SH pony1602318 +-SH unicorn537851 +-SH g42028806 +-SH anatomically correct35717 +-SH anus137483 +-SH bondage46518 +-SH bunny ears5300 +-SH bunny hood42 +-SH butt231193 +-SH clitoris41683 +-SH colored pupils13234 +-SH dialogue92983 +-SH dock71247 +-SH easter2000 +-SH easter egg1652 +-SH egg5493 +-SH egg insertion479 +-SH eyes closed138970 +-SH female1802521 +-SH filly97352 +-SH floppy ears72971 +-SH foalcon22115 +-SH frog (hoof)20109 +-SH holiday35241 +-SH implied anon986 +-SH insertion23952 +-SH microphone7498 +-SH molestation1977 +-SH nudity512599 +-SH oviposition2678 +-SH patreon15304 +-SH patreon logo9691 +-SH plot144070 +-SH ponut64061 +-SH raised tail25127 +-SH self bondage288 +-SH solo1425942 +-SH solo female234539 +-SH squeaky belle26 +-SH stuck3775 +-SH tail100643 +-SH tangled up569 +-SH underhoof68952 +-SH vaginal insertion8693 +-SH vulva190387
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
“holy fucking shit consent is irrelevant anyways stop worrying about it”
You just made me worry more.
How mutually exclusive.
holy fucking shit consent is irrelevant anyways stop worrying about it
inb4 i take great offense to that
i dont care
Edited
Reading things into comments and judging people by a label are two more ways of conveniently supporting your argument.
You’re still using an incomplete definition
The classical style of debate first requires common definitions of words to be agreed upon before tackling the issue at hand – and in fact “”””“my brain and logical thinking””””” would know that to argue whether something is this or that requires you agreeing on what that thing actually is, and definitions are at the very least a great jumping off point to do this. They’re not written by Satan himself trying to disagree with you, they’re written in an attempt to unify the meanings of our words. And in this case, if that’s a bad definition of rape, then you could easily say that if you gently had sex with someone who didn’t want it, or “didn’t resist hard enough” (sex with someone who’s been roofied is not rape now, guys!), it wasn’t rape. And I find that absolutely ridiculous.
You know what is proof that this isn’t rape? The comment that someone bothered to present me with from the artist stating that it wasn’t. That’s irrefutable considering it’s up to how the original drawing is intended. So I can say that, in this particular instance, it was not rape, by “Word of God”.
But let’s get past that. Instead of just explaining why you disagreed, or providing your own better definition, you had to stoop to belittling my character, assuming that I’m some sort of dictionary warrior, and then claiming yourself as supreme ruler of logic (insert fedora tip here).
Enjoy that duck badge. I’d say you’ve earned it.
You guys always with your definitions pulled from some dictionary….. Every dictionary has stuff like that listed differently and guys like you just pick out whatever definition fits your argument.
I rather use my brain and ability of logical thinking. And, coming from someone who hates rape and who you will find making criticizing rape in the comments here quite often, this here isn’t rape, it’s just some dumb messing around and Sweetie doesn’t show a sign of actually disagreeing or feeling like she’s raped.
Sometimes, even a vagina is just a body part. Don’t take everything so seriously.
Edited
That’s a terrible definiton of rape
Also
@Pusspuss
Well, here is a definition of rape:
“unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.”
Foreign object, clear “no!”, penetration of the vagina…rape. Doesn’t matter how light-hearted, it’s rape and this site implies grimdark for it. While I disagree with implying grimdark, it is wholeheartedly rape. Whether the opening was open or not, it’s still rape. She did not want it to be, and she said no - it’s rape.
EDIT: It’s possible that it’s a complaining “nooooo!” But I wouldn’t bank on that. At BEST I’d slap “dubious consent” on here.
Edited
Not quite. Rape is the act of having sex with someone without their agreement, or in other words, to force someone to have sex. The egg here, though, barely goes inside and is just resting at the entrance (after it had already been open before).
This is more like a dumb joke, like putting someone’s hoof into warm water or sticking something disgusting in someone’s mouth while they’re asleep.
If he would take the egg and push it further inside and then thrusts it, while Sweetie says she doesn’t want this, then it would be rape.
Edited
Oh, it was, apparently, oops.
It’s still there
>>1424098
Did it get blocked by your filters or something?
Edited
She did it on purpose. ;D