Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Pony Arts & Prints!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

safe edit.

safe2160953 artist:coinpo245 edit171881 twilight sparkle355647 alicorn311423 pony1588755 g42013621 blush sticker3881 blushing270603 conservative21 cute263995 discussion in the comments817 donald trump325 female1788138 hat123180 heart eyes29257 make america great again133 mouthpiece1328 oh boy here we go21 op is a duck4858 op started shit232 open mouth234556 politics1771 politics in the comments167 republican50 simple background588530 smiling392384 solo1414567 spread wings92807 twiabetes15220 twilight sparkle (alicorn)148353 white background158832 wingding eyes39246
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #3C3D
I see atleast some simi-political art survived the great purging of the internet, what with reddit and youtube banning things with blanket terms and bs reasoning.
Night Eternal

🛡ɳყא รρα૨ҡℓε🛡
I was almost about to shame the artist, and then I realized it was an edit. You should get permission before posting other people’s artwork with stuff like this. It makes them look bad.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
“Mainstream media” is not the same thing as how society at large treats people.
 
Remember, media and entertainment is often more progressive than the country at large. They were overwhelmingly for gay marriage years before it was legalized, and even further back, it was common for entertainers to promote racial equality even before segregation had to be ended by federal mandate.
 
Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that people in the media are as supportive as they are, but it doesn’t paint a totally accurate picture of how people are treated in day-to-day society.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
I really didn’t want to reply, but I strongly disagree. Find me a piece of mainstream media that has anything other than the highest of praise for transgender people. It’s the same way in school. There may be bullies, but the kids are taught that it’s wrong to bully, ie it has no mainstream acceptance. Transgender people, like everyone who isn’t a straight white man, are treated as saints in mainstream culture.  
Anyway, I’m done. Like I said, this was nice.=, and again God bless you.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
It’s because of the discrimination they face. I said that in my previous post.
 
Transgender people are one of the most maligned groups in our society. It’s certainly gotten better, but they’re still largely treated as social outcasts and many trans people face a combination of intense relentless bullying and crippling loneliness.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
I’m sorry. I’m tired of arguing. I just want this to end.  
I only have one other thing I want to say: If the best solution for “gender dysphoria” (aka body dysmorphia) is transitioning, then why is the suicide rate of post-op transgenders the same as the rate for pre-op transgenders?  
You can respond to that if you want, but I won’t respond in turn.  
I won’t lie. This was actually a stimulating discourse, and I enjoy hearing what the other side has to say, just to keep myself in check. I hope you feel as enlightened as I do. God bless you.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
It doesn’t matter who started it. Trump’s in office now, not Obama; By continuing a bad policy, it’s still Trump’s responsibility. This is wrong and it needs to end. He’s talked about ending it, but it’s not happening correctly. Furthermore, his new executive order is changing the 20-day time limit on hearings to allow for indefinite detention, which is unacceptable. There needs to be a time limit on how long undocumented immigrants can be held in custody.
 
The reason I use the term undocumented immigrant is simply because not all of them are here illegally. Some legal residents lack documentation for any number of reasons, so “undocumented immigrant” is a broader umbrella that covers both legal and illegal immigrants that lack the paperwork to be here.
 
The purpose of the trials is to determine whether or not they’re legally allowed to be here. Without a trial, how do you even know if someone’s not a citizen or legal resident? You don’t. Due process for non-citizens is still necessary to protect the rights of citizens.
 
The transgender ban is wrong because it’s a sweeping ban of an entire class of people. Transgenderism is recognized as legitimate by the medical community, and the most effective “treatment” is transitioning to the identity that matches how they perceive themselves. The suicide rate is so high because of the rejection they face in society; The more accepted they become, the lower the suicide rate drops.
 
Trump’s popularity is irrelevant to my approval of him. Whether I disapprove of him with most of the country or all by myself, I do so because of my observations of his presidency and actions in office. What other people like or don’t like about the president has no bearing on my position, and frankly, it shouldn’t on anyone’s.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
They’re not “undocumented immigrants.” They’re illegal aliens. You wanna talk about language setting a dangerous precedent? That’s it. Also, “family separation” wasn’t Trump’s idea. He’s just doing what Obama did. Those photos you’ve probably seen of kids inside fences? Those are from the Obama administration. Also, they technically don’t have the right to a trial since they’re not citizens.  
I’m in the army and I support the transgender ban. I don’t want people with such a disproportionate suicide rate serving alongside me, because I simply wouldn’t trust someone that unstable with my life. And let’s not beat around the bush. “Gender dysphoria” is a mental illness that we’re encouraging people not to seek treatment for. That’s why their suicide rate is so high. (inb4 someone dismisses my argument because it offends them)  
Trump’s approval rating has risen since he became president. Also, every time a president has faced controversy and protest during his first term, he’s been re-elected by a wider margin. It happened with Reagan. Hell, it happened just fourteen years ago with George W. Bush. Expect the same with Trump.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
I think the fact that he pandered to people with anti-Muslim prejudice, whether or not he was sincere at the time, still sets a bad precedent. Re-tweeting fake crime statistics about black people from a Twitter account called White Genocide is a major problem.
 
Going by his actions in office alone, there’s the family separation of undocumented immigrants, making calls to revoke due process or trials for undocumented migrants (which is kind of the only way to prove they’re here illegally in the first place, meaning legal residents could be targeted under such a scheme), the transgender military ban, etc.
 
These are all serious problems that need to be fought back on. And that’s why in November I and many others will be voting to try to do what we can to protect our most vulnerable from this administration’s harmful policies.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
It’s pretty clear to me that Trump said and did whatever he needed to say and do to get enough votes. I judge people by their actions, not their words. Similarly, I’m judging Trump by his presidency, not his campaign.  
Moreover, people in general sometimes say something and change their mind later on. It’s as simple as that.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
That’s the current ban. We’re talking past each other.
 
I’m referring to the ban he proposed during his campaign, where he said - verbatim - “Donald Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the U.S.”
 
Please address the fact that Trump did propose an actual Muslim ban, even if he could never actually enact one.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
I agree that a religion shouldn’t be outright banned, and so does President Trump. It’s not a Muslim ban. It’s a ban by country, based on a list outlined by President Obama of Middle Eastern countries whose people represent potential threats to the United States. It doesn’t include countries with the highest populations of Muslims, such as India and Malaysia. As far as I’m concerned, it’s nothing more than an expression of sovereignty.  
By the way, may I just say, I’m shocked none of our comments have been removed so far. Usually the mods go into panic mode the moment anyone brings up anything remotely political, especially Trump.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@Background Pony #BEBC
 
None of this justifies banning Muslims. We are a country that does not impose a religious test, period.
 
I mean, if we go by the “They’re allowed to lie” clause, then what’s to stop bad Muslims from just lying about being Muslim altogether? What do you do then, just ban Arab people on the basis of their ethnicity, because they’re “probably” Muslim?
 
Again, the solution is to police actual criminal offenses, not religion.
 
Not just as a half-Arab child of a Muslim immigrant, but as an American, I’m pretty skeezed out by the idea of imposing a religious test on American citizenship. That flies in the face of what my country is about, and I for one am glad that Trump did not have the power to make that particular campaign promise a reality.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@BigBadSeed
 
From a practical standpoint, can we agree that the solution is not banning people of a particular religion, but rather, banning illegal practices - whether they be sanctioned by religion or not?
 
You don’t go after Muslims. You go after genital-mutilators and honor-killers. You go after people who abuse their families. You go after people who attack LGBT people (or anyone), whether it’s religiously motivated or not. America has plenty of Muslims and pretty much no issue with Islamic fundamentalism, because we police that shit.
 
You’ll also have to forgive that I don’t always buy the “moderate majority” argument since Islam says it’s okay to lie to nonbelievers.
 
Irrelevant. Anyone from any background can lie. Criminals lie about their crimes, whether or not they believe those lies are sanctioned by God.
 
You know a person’s character by what they do more than what they say. Most Muslims in America just go to work, spend time with their friends and families, pursue hobbies, etc. just like anyone else.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
At least we have some common ground. For the record, I think it should be easier to immigrate to the United States legally, but in the mean time the law is the law.  
“I might as well be right” was the wrong choice of words. I just hate it when people don’t have the courtesy to admit they’ve run out of arguments.  
As for the Islam thing, I understand that it might be a sensitive subject for you, but you’ll just have to forgive me my perspective on the issue. You’ll also have to forgive that I don’t always buy the “moderate majority” argument since Islam says it’s okay to lie to nonbelievers.
Zendigo

Social Justice Pacifist
@Background Pony #BEBC
 
My Muslim father is not for genital mutilation, and neither of my sisters had their genitals mutilated, nor were they forced to wear hijabs or anything else. I am also openly bisexual, and neither me nor my siblings follow Islam personally; Yet he loves us all the same and has never acted violently toward us in the name of his religion, or for any other reason. (Seriously, we weren’t even spanked; Strictly groundings and loss of privileges if we misbehaved as kids)
 
My point in using him as an example is that there can be, and has to be, a separation between followers of a religion and the the written beliefs of that religion. It is often not a 1:1 overlap, especially since many religious people are more “culturally religious” than devoted fundamentalists or literalists.
 
I do not defend Islam. Islam is a belief system with sexist undercurrents that runs counter to my feminist beliefs and my beliefs as an LGBT rights advocate. You don’t need to tell me the problems of Islam. It warrants criticism and I’m right there criticizing it with you.
 
I do defend Muslims as people, because no matter what their religion says, not all followers observe the more pernicious aspects of the faith. We cannot ban people for the religion they follow; That is anti-American and wrong. We can - and indeed must - ban the fundamentalist observation of religions like this. You see the difference?
 
You don’t ban Muslims. You ban genital mutilation, honor killings, etc. You criminalize the people who do that shit to the fullest extent of the law. But you do not and - in America - cannot simply ban Muslims from entering, as Trump wanted to do during his campaign for president.
 
@BigBadSeed
 
That’s fallacious reasoning.
 
Let’s assume that I’m wrong, or that I simply don’t have an answer to one of my opponent’s points. That doesn’t automatically make my opponent right. It’s absolutely possible for both sides to be wrong, or for both sides to be right on different matters. I’m not saying any of that is necessarily true in this case, but I am pointing out that arguments aren’t so simple as “If Side A is wrong, Side B is right.”
 
Either way, I’m not ignoring the issues of illegal immigration. If Trump had merely called the illegal immigrants criminals, he would be legally correct. The problem is that he characterized them as rapists and murderers, which - certainly - some are, but the majority clearly aren’t. The vast majority of people who cross the Mexican border - legally or otherwise - are looking for work and a better life.
 
You can oppose illegal immigration without resorting to fear tactics and casting aspersions on the character of the people who illegally enter the country. This is still an area in which Trump chose unnecessarily inflammatory rhetoric, which have only served to divide the country instead of promoting practical or humane solutions to the issue.
 
Understand, that I do not promote open borders or a lack of immigration control. I oppose the way we’re dealing with illegal immigration, not the fact that we’re dealing with it at all.
SorryNeverSorry

Offensive. Please ban.
@Zendigo  
I know not ALL Muslims are bad people, but I think enough have presented threats to the West to warrant caution.  
Also I like how you’re now ignoring the issues of illegal immigrants and women. If you don’t have a counter argument then I might as well be right.
Background Pony #E4A3
@Zendigo  
Zendigo, I can’t forgive Trump sometimes being a clown, but female genital mutilation is wājib (obligatory) in the Shafi’i school of Islam. This is why 97% of women in Indonesia and 98% of women in Somalia have mutilated genitals: it is literally part of the religion. I’ll take Trump’s occasional stupid words over an alternative’s stupid policies any day.
 
Prejudice on the basis of religion is 100% right and just if the religion says to mutilate clitorises. This is why keeping out Somalians and Indonesians and all other Shafi’i Muslims is so right and necessary.
 
The First Amendment applies only to US citizens. It has nothing whatsoever to do with which foreign nationals we let into our country.
 
One female genital mutilation case reported every hour in the UK
 
Female genital mutilation cases rise in UK, but no prosecutions
 
NHS attended to 9,000 FGM cases in England last year, report reveals
 
It is literally part of their religion, like male circumcision in Judaism. The only solution is to keep out 100% Shafi’i Muslims by definition of that they believe female genital mutilation is wājib.