Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Ministry of Image - Fanfiction Printing

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Remember everyone, when two members of the same sex are near, that does not mean they are homosexuals. Sometimes people are just friends, and sometimes a children’s cartoon is just a children’s cartoon.

safe2176361 screencap295934 pinkie pie256087 pony1604552 g42031044 the gift of the maud pie1048 background pony12295 john candy24 meme93945 meta18644 neighl page30 not gay235 planes trains and automobiles39 politics1791 ponies standing next to each other221 rage1790 shipping denied1009 shipping goggles25 steve martin34 text89758 train3452 tv-y380 unnamed character4640 unnamed pony2758
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

deactivated9659a69

Actually, yeah, a lot of people do interpret homosexuality where there is none. We are allowed to sit next to someone of the same gender, right? We’re allowed to be FRIENDS with them, right? Friendship is magic.
thevideonasty

We got a soup! soup!
What interpretation though? They’re ponifications of existing characters, one with a wife, and one with a deceased wife who’s death he’s not taking too well.
Background Pony #2B3A
Anyway, on a different tack, I sorta hope someone gets one of those anti-gay organizations up in arms over this; it’d be fun to watch their reaction when everyone laughs at them for not getting the reference.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus
 
@Brony_Conundrum
 
Ok since a Mod has showed up again, I’m just gonna say “I don’t agree with you but you can believe what you want.” just please don’t reply to me again, I will otherwise regard it as some mad fervor to convert the heretic.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus  
That doesn’t change what the authors intend, though.
 
It’s hard to believe this all occurred because someone thought two characters were gay when they were not. The characters are from a movie, so we know that the author intention was that they were representations of two movie characters, not two gay people. Do you see what I’m getting at?